‘Days of Rage’: Protestors Planning to Occupy Wall Street Hope to Bring Tahrir Square Home to the US

By Danette Clark

Just six days after the upcoming 10th Anniversary of September 11 and the opening of the 9/11 memorial, left-wing protestors will march through downtown Manhattan — with tents and sleeping bags in tow — in an effort to “Occupy Wall Street.”

Three radical organizations, Adbusters (also known as Culture Jammers), Occupy Wall Street, and US Day of Rage, have launched a vast campaign to occupy Wall Street for two months or more starting on September 17. The plan behind the occupation is to “find a common voice in one clear, unified demand … that awakens the imagination and, if achieved, would propel us toward the radical democracy of the future.”

Organizers say they are hoping to rally 20,000 people to flood into lower Manhattan where they will set up tents, kitchens, and peaceful barricades. Once there, they will “incessantly repeat one simple demand in a plurality of voices.”

So, what is the one, clear, unified demand that may forever change the world? They have no clue, yet. But I’m sure it will have something to do with evil capitalism.

By way of Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit, scores of “redeemers, rebels, radicals, and utopian dreamers” are spreading the word and discussing what the one demand should be.

Adbusters’ Occupy Wall Street Facebook page invites followers to vote for their favorite demand. There are 100 to choose from. Several demands on the list are apparently nothing more than tasteless attempts at humor, but received votes nonetheless. For example:

.Make Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman Fight to the Death
. Their Heads on Poles
. Kill Ruper Murdoch
. Free the Unicorns

The top 10 demands based on the number of votes received so far are:

. Revoke Corporate Personhood
. Abolish Capitalism
. Presidential Commission to Separate Money from Politics
. Tax Wall Street
. Raise Taxes on the Top 2%
. Public Healthcare
. Close Half of America’s 1000 Military Bases
. End Corporate Welfare
. Four-hour Workday
. Resource Based Economy

Organizers at Adbusters’ Culture Jammers Headquarters write that the most exciting candidate they have heard so far is to “demand that President Obama ordain a Presidential Commission tasked with ending the influence money has over our representatives in Washington.”

Really? Do they even know who Barack Obama is?

Apparently, this group of radicals views Obama as some sort of deity if they think he can “ordain” anything.

Also, do they not know Obama has taken many, many millions from bundlers and big money corporations?

On July 26, Adbusters ran an ad calling for radicals to join in the occupation of Wall Street and asking the question, “Is America Ripe for a Tahrir Movement?”

Culture Jammers likens their expectations of the upcoming protests to those in Egypt months ago, stating, “It feels much like it did in Tahrir Square, moments before Mubarak caved. You’ve never felt so alive.”

The protests that began in January of this year in Cairo’s Tahrir Square and other cities in Egypt have become known as the 2011 Egyptian Revolution. The first few weeks of protesting led to the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak. The struggle continues today, with at least 846 people dead and 6,000 injured.

Several reporters were assaulted while among the protesters in and around the Square. CBS News reporter, Lara Logan, was sexually assaulted and beaten by several men inside Tahrir Square right after it was announced that President Mubarak had stepped down. Fortunately, Logan was rescued by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers.

Days of Rage

USDayofRage.org proclaims “Let the US Days of Rage Begin … On September 17, 2011, Wall Street belongs to US.”

The phrase “Days of Rage” was originally used by the media to describe a series of direct actions that took place over the course of three days in Chicago in 1969. The “Days of Rage” demonstrations were organized by the Weatherman faction of Students for a Democratic Society.

The Weathermen, later known as the Weather Underground Organization, was founded in part by communist William Ayers. The goal was to create a revolutionary party for the violent overthrow of the U.S. government.

During the 2008 Presidential campaign, Ayers was found to be closely linked to President Obama.

In what would later become typical Weathermen style, the 1969 Days of Rage, and the days leading up to it, consisted of violent demonstrations and blowing things up. A commemorative statue of a murdered police officer in Haymarket Square was destroyed by a dynamite bomb that was placed between the legs of the statue. The blast scattered pieces of the statue onto the Kennedy Expressway below and shattered nearly 100 windows.

Weathermen and fellow demonstrators, dawning motorcycle and football helmets, charged and attacked police officers and smashed windows in automobiles, buildings and homes.

In his 2001 book, Fugitive Days, Ayers reminisced about the Days of Rage when he wrote, “the streets became sparkling and treacherous with the jagged remains of our rampage.” He describes the scene as “crystal chaos,” a term chillingly similar to the term used by the Nazis 30 years ago to describe their sparkling rampage through the streets of Germany. The Nazi regime used the term Kristallnacht, which means “Crystal Night.”

In another strange and chilling “coincidence,” prior to the start of the 2011 Egyptian Revolution in Cairo early this year, opposition leaders organized the protesting to begin on January 25, declaring it a “Day of Rage.”

Not so coincidental is the fact that Adbusters receives funding from the Tides Foundation and partners with several other organizations funded by George Soros’ Open Society Institute.

Soros-Connected Political Activist Arrested for Computer Hacking

What are the chances that an alleged computer hacker has connections to a George Soros-funded organization?

Here we have Aaron Swartz, 24, a “political activist, prominent computer programmer and former ethics fellow at Harvard,” who is now facing four federal felony charges” of computer hacking.

Local prosecutors said Swartz used Massachusetts Institute of Technology facilities and internet connections to access the JSTOR database. Swartz is also facing “two state felony charges for breaking into a ‘depository’ and breaking & entering in the daytime.”

Swartz is only vaguely referenced as a “political activist,” while his political activist connections are not detailed.

Fortunately, Swartz’s name immediately triggered my memory.

That Aaron Swartz is capable of hacking is no surprise. His aptitude for such a devious act becomes clear when one knows he is also the co-inventor of RSS 1.0, helped launch Creative Commons, and co-founded Reddit. He also co-founded watchdog.net, Open Library, and Jottit.

Most recently, Swartz founded another activist site, Demand Progress.

But it is Swartz’s knack for political manipulation that will stand out after you learn he is also a co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC).

In November 2009, I wrote the following profile about the PCCC. Enjoy.

The PCCC is another one of those groups that slipped under the radar without notice during the January 2009 inaugural silly season — unless you’re a card-carrying progressive, that is.

Former RBO regulars already know what’s coming: PCCC is another George Soros-funded MoveOn.org “project.”

To be honest, if I had not been a Google email user, I might have remained oblivious, too. But — there it was — right at the top of the incoming email links.

Chris Bower of Open Left wrote a January 8, 2009, blog post announcing PCCC’s launch:

    An exciting new piece of progressive infrastructure is emerging to help progressive candidates in federal campaigns: The Progressive Change Campaign Committee. Rather than focusing on large, independent expenditures, ala the Club for Growth, it seeks to help progressive federal candidates, such as Tom Geoghegan, by providing them with expert staff, advice, strategy and connection to the netroots. The focus will be on open seat primaries, and progressives who face competitive general elections, but primaries against conservative Democrats might also come into play.

Bower cited Ryan Grim (previously with POLITICO), who wrote January 7 at HuffPo:

    A group of progressive operatives from MoveOn and labor circles have teamed with a prominent Internet pioneer to try to give the Sam Bennetts of the world the final push they need — and send even more [Tom] Perriellos to Congress. The organization will be the first of its kind exclusively to focus on electing progressive Democrats in congressional elections.

    It won’t focus its energy on unseating conservative Democrats, but [Adam] Green, a cofounder, didn’t rule out the possibility. Instead, it will prioritize competitive open-seat primaries and help general election candidates like Bennett and Perriello run effective campaigns.

    The group’s first forays are likely to be in the Illinois district vacated by Rahm Emanuel, who left to become Obama’s chief of staff. Green says the group is in talks with a progressive labor lawyer, Tom Geoghegan, in that district. Another potential target: the California district emptied by Hilda Solis, who’s been tapped to be labor secretary….

    The PCCC aims to be something of a guiding resource for first-time candidates like Bennett. By helping candidates find good campaign staff and make more effective use of the Internet, the group thinks candidates could save tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in consultant fees. Whereas consultants might charge thousands to record and pump out robo-calls, for instance, the PCCC could show a candidate how to do it in-house, online, for a fraction of the cost.

Adam Green is MoveOn.org’s former Director of Strategic Campaigns.

Fellow PCCC co-founders are Aaron Swartz; Periello campaign staff member Darcy Burner, affiliated with K Street’s Campaign for America’s Future; and Stephanie Taylor, “who ran Perriello’s field operation in the campaign’s final month, is a former union organizer with over ten years of field and online experience at SEIU, the AFL-CIO, the DNC and MoveOn.org. Mudcat Arnold was Burner’s field director and Michael Snook was data director and targeting analyst for Perriello.”

Lots of takeaways from the above but the one that leaps off the page is that candidates won’t have to waste campaign donor bucks paying consultants to “pump out robo-calls.” PCCC is going to teach them how to drive voters to the edge of the cliff all on their own.

Bower explains that PCCC “is for real, composed of former campaign staff, MoveOn.org staff, and labor organizers. It is also on track to raise $650,000 this year, and has MoveOn.org backing. It should hit its fundraising targets no sweat, and it’s experienced team knows what it is doing in a campaign setting.”

Fundraising “targets no sweat”? We’ll get back to this.

Now ask yourself why in the world Dems would need the PCCC. Hasn’t the DNC, DCCC, DSCC etc. etc. etc. been doing the job?

Ryan Grim gives us the answer at HuffPo:

    Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, which financially backs Democratic candidates it thinks have a shot to win but does not prioritize progressive Democrats over conservative Democrats. The DCCC has had a patchy relationship with the liberal blogosphere, which charges it with relying too heavily on old-school expensive Democratic consultants and not being willing to take chances on progressive candidates.

Earth to Ryan: The “liberal blogosphere”, if you’re talking about the Great Orange Cheeto and blogs of its ilk, aren’t so “all in” for The One anymore. Might be small problem here?

And, if you need any further proof that all Dems — and the “expensive Democratic consultants” — have not always been falling meekly into line with the progressive agenda, here it is. The PCCC planned to step in to make sure they obediently toe the mark for 2010 (and beyond) — or else.

And, to make sure the cash keeps flowing, Bowers wrote that the PCCC had been “added” to Better Democrats 2010, another cog in the little MoveOn.org money laundering op called ActBlue.

It should surprise no one that ActBlue works just like the ACORN funny money puzzle — or like the Tides Center/Foundation that disburses unattributed funds to who-knows-whom-what-or-where — without leaving a legal trace behind.

If you want to see what kind of funding is flowing into ActBlue for various PCCC campaigns, look here. Prime targets you ask? Max Baucus, POTUS, Olympia Snowe, Ben Nelson, Harry Reid.

You can watch some video attack ads here and get instructions and a script on how to conduct robo-calls for the DemCare public option, as well as watch a video clip here.

Oh. Bowers’s January 2009 parting comment is so touching: “While it may seem [shockingly] early to start a 2010 campaign page, the early bird gets to govern.”

Fact Check

PolitiFact even has PCCC’s number. On the statement “76 percent of Americans want a public health care option” PolitiFact says False.

In fact, PolitiFact exposes the source for the claim, the website “We Want the Public Option” which posts “76% of Americans Say We Want the Public Option” at the top of its page.

PolitiFact writes:

    The Web site also includes a video that has no voice-over, just a list of signatures supporting a public option in the health care reform plan, plus a smattering of statistics about reform. The signatures were collected by the two liberal groups — Democracy for America and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee — that paid for the ad.

    The ad aired for the first time on July 23, 2009, in Washington, D.C., and Montana.

Democracy for America — hmmm — Isn’t that former presidential candidate and former DNC Chair Howard Dean’s organization?